WHO Releases First Global tWLA List for Medical Devices; China’s NMPA Included!
Views:86
Time:2026-08-12 13:58:07

In July 2026, the World Health Organization (WHO) rolled out a landmark policy for the medical device industry: the inaugural list of transitional WHO Listed Authorities for Medical Devices (tWLAs-MD). Only 12 top-tier global regulatory bodies made the cut, including China’s National Medical Products Administration (NMPA).

This list marks a paradigm shift in global medical device regulation, phasing out the old Stringent Regulatory Authorities (SRA) framework originally designed for pharmaceuticals and vaccines, and ushering in the standardized WHO Listed Authority (WLA) evaluation system. For Chinese medical device manufacturers going global, this WHO-endorsed authoritative roster completely reshapes the underlying logic of worldwide registration, delivering a massive boost to the international credibility of domestic medical device registration certificates.





https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/list-of-transitional-wlas-for-medical-devices

一、tWLAs-MD



(一)Background of Release

For a long time, the WHO only established the SRA roster for pharmaceuticals and vaccines. No unified, globally recognized benchmark authority list existed specifically for medical devices. Without consistent standards for cross-border registration reliance and regulatory collaboration, manufacturers faced repeated technical reviews, prolonged approval timelines and exorbitant overseas compliance costs. Low- and middle-income countries, constrained by limited regulatory expertise and manpower, also struggled to bring high-quality medical devices to patients in a timely manner.

The WHO formally issued the tWLAs-MD interim list on July 14, 2026, serving as a transitional pathway toward permanent WLA accreditation with a five-year validity term. During the transition period, the WHO will continuously monitor and assess each authority’s regulatory performance: bodies meeting standards will upgrade to permanent WLA status, while underperforming ones will be removed from the roster. This creates a dynamic, transparent, performance-centric global regulatory evaluation system.


(二)Official Statement from WHO Leadership
Dr. Rogério Gaspar, Director of WHO’s Department of Regulation and Prequalification, commented:The transitional WHO Listed Authority list is a critical milestone in building an interconnected, efficient global medical device regulatory ecosystem. By fostering cross-regulator trust and enabling reuse of review outcomes, we can maximize limited regulatory resources and help populations worldwide gain faster access to safe, effective, quality-assured medical devices.

(三)Core Underlying Mechanism: Regulatory Reliance

Regulatory Reliance, as defined by the WHO, forms the core value of this list: Regulatory authorities of any jurisdiction may fully reference complete review findings and inspection reports issued by tWLA-listed authorities. They only need to carry out supplementary assessments addressing local market-specific requirements, rather than launching full independent technical evaluations from scratch. Critically, each national regulator retains full independent authority and ultimate accountability for all products authorized for domestic sale, with no compromise to local safety oversight standards.

Over 70% of countries worldwide suffer shortages of regulatory staff and technical capabilities. Regulatory Reliance is the official industry solution promoted by the WHO, and the tWLAs-MD serves as the globally unified whitelist of reference regulators eligible for cross-jurisdictional reliance.



二、Full Roster of the 12 Global tWLAs-MD Authorities



Listed alphabetically, all agencies hold recognition covering medical devices and in vitro diagnostics (IVD). The complete directory is as follows:
  1. Australia: Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)
  2. Brazil: Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) — the sole Latin American representative on the list
  3. Canada: Health Canada
  4. China: National Medical Products Administration (NMPA)
  5. European Union: European Medical Devices Regulatory Network
  6. Republic of Korea: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS)
  7. Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare / Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)
  8. Russian Federation: Ministry of Health (MoH)
  9. Switzerland: Swissmedic (Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products)
  10. Singapore: Health Sciences Authority (HSA)
  11. United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
  12. United States: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)


Two Industry-defining Takeaways

Historic Milestone for China’s NMPA:This marks the first official WHO recognition of China’s medical device regulatory capacity. Following NMPA’s admission to ICH and the IMDRF Management Committee, this is another landmark global endorsement. Domestic medical device registration certificates now rank alongside review conclusions issued by the world’s top-tier regulatory bodies.

Brazil’s ANVISA Holds Exclusive Regulatory Voice in Latin AmericaAmong over 30 Latin American nations, ANVISA is the only authority selected for the tWLA roster. For all regional jurisdictions implementing Regulatory Reliance mechanisms, approvals granted by ANVISA will serve as a priority reference basis. Launching registration in Brazil first before expanding across Latin America emerges as the optimal overseas market entry strategy.


三、Three Core Strategic Benefits for Medical Device Enterprises



(一)Systematic Upgrade to the Global Recognition of NMPA Registration Certificates
Previously, FDA clearances and EU CE marking served as the primary entry tickets for Chinese manufacturers seeking overseas market access, while review outcomes issued by NMPA were rarely accepted by foreign regulators. With the rollout of the tWLA list, jurisdictions implementing Regulatory Reliance worldwide are legally permitted to reference full NMPA registration technical dossiers, clinical data and quality system inspection reports.
Pioneering Practical Case:Malaysia’s Medical Device Authority (MDA) has completed two joint evaluation pilot programs with NMPA under the Global Harmonization Working Party (GHWP)’s Collaborative Evaluation Reliance Practice framework. Medical devices holding valid NMPA registration can secure drastically shortened review timelines in Malaysia, with multiple Southeast Asian countries rolling out parallel mutual trust policies.
Operational Advice for Enterprises:Optimize product launch sequencing by completing domestic NMPA registration prior to overseas expansion, maximizing the global reusability of investment in a single round of technical review.
(二)Expanded Market Access Dividends for Latin America, with Brazil as the Regional Hub

As Latin America’s sole tWLA authority, ANVISA’s role as a regional regulatory benchmark will be further reinforced:

  • Brazil operates its own AREE (Equivalent Foreign Regulatory Authorities) system, enabling simplified review pathways for products approved by listed bodies including the FDA, EU regulators and NMPA;
  • Mexico updated its registration guidance in 2026, offering a 30-working-day fast-track channel for devices authorized by IMDRF/tWLA-listed authorities;
  • Brazil and Chile have reached mutual recognition of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) inspections, while the Rio de Janeiro Declaration accelerates regulatory convergence across Latin America.


Overseas Market Strategy:For enterprises targeting multiple South American markets, prioritize ANVISA registration in Brazil. Leverage its tWLA accreditation to expand into Mexico, Chile, Argentina and other regional markets, drastically cutting redundant registration costs across jurisdictions.

(三)Restructured Global Registration Strategies: Build Efficient Chain-style Market Access Pathways
The 12 tWLA authorities act as core anchor points in the global Regulatory Reliance chain, with two distinct overseas expansion models yielding vastly different efficiency outcomes:
Efficient Chain-style Pathway:Secure initial approval via NMPA or the FDA → File applications in Brazil by referencing existing review conclusions → Expand across Latin America relying on ANVISA authorization → Gain expedited entry into Southeast Asia and the Middle East using EU/Singapore HSA certification. Review data is reused end-to-end, cutting single-country approval cycles by over 50%.

Traditional Isolated PathwaySubmit full standalone applications, complete independent clinical evaluations and undergo separate quality system audits for every jurisdiction. Each market takes 12–24 months to clear, with manpower and capital costs doubled.


四、IMDRF Releases Playbook for Regulatory Reliance Programs



Concurrent with the launch of the WHO tWLA list, the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) published its Playbook for Medical Device Regulatory Reliance Programs in February 2026. The document delivers standardized implementation guidance for regulators worldwide to operationalize reliance frameworks, covering the full product lifecycle:
Categories of regulatory reliance:Multilateral mutual recognition, parallel joint evaluation, unilateral reliance, and shared GMP audit results;
Scope of application:Technical dossier review, clinical evaluation inspection, post-market adverse event surveillance, and product change assessment;
Implementation criteria:Clear specifications on which tWLA authority review reports qualify for direct reliance, boundaries for simplified procedures, and cross-border information sharing standards.

Superposition Effect of Dual Policy Releases:The WHO defines the roster of authoritative reference regulators, while IMDRF provides actionable implementation tools. Interconnected global medical device regulation is an irreversible industry megatrend.


五、Rational & Objective Industry Perspective



A critical fact must be clarified: the tWLAs-MD is merely an official reference list published by the WHO with no legally binding force. Each national regulatory authority retains independent decision-making power, and inclusion on the list does not guarantee automatic approval for overseas registration.
  1. The roster only serves as a reference basis; all jurisdictions will conduct supplementary localized reviews addressing domestic legislation, ethnic population differences and local healthcare environments;
  2. Policy rollout will lag in many small and medium-sized markets in the short term, requiring continuous tracking of updates to target countries’ Regulatory Reliance rules;
  3. The scope of reliance varies by product classification and risk grade, with stringent review standards still applied to high-risk implantable devices.

The long-term trend remains unambiguous: all nations face constraints on regulatory resources and share a core demand to eliminate redundant review work. Regulatory Reliance mechanisms will continue to gain global traction, and enterprises that proactively adopt tWLA-aligned registration roadmaps will capture first-mover market advantages.


    六、Conclusion



    The release of the WHO’s inaugural tWLA list for medical devices represents a major policy dividend for the internationalization of China’s medical device industry. The era of cross-border mutual recognition in global medical device regulation has officially begun. Mastery of the 12 WHO-recognized authoritative regulatory anchors will become a core competitive edge for domestic medical device manufacturers breaking into global markets. For further detailed consultation, please contact Wiselink.


    Contact Us
    Fill Form
    Whether you need more information or wish to cooperate with us, we will guide you through every step of the regulatory process. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest global regulatory updates.